| Number | 102
|
| Category | errata
|
| Synopsis | TOC goes only 1 level down
|
| State | lrmdraft
|
| Class | errata-discuss
|
| Arrival-Date | Aug 22 2002
|
| Originator | Shalom.Bresticker@motorola.com
|
| Release | 2001b: TOC
|
| Environment |
|
| Description |
In IEEE version of 1364-2001, Table of Contents lists only clauses and one level of subclauses (2 digits). IEEE Standards Style Manual says we can go down one more level (sub-sub-clauses, 3 digits) if WG requests from IEEE Standards Project Editor. |
| Fix |
Expand the table of contents to include 2 levels of subclauses except subclauses 23, 25 and 27 and sub-subclauses of 26.6. |
| Audit-Trail |
From: Shalom.Bresticker@motorola.com To: etf-bugs@boyd.com Cc: Subject: Re: errata/102: PROPOSAL - TOC goes only 1 level down Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2003 22:02:46 +0200 (IST) It appears that the reason that the subclauses of sections 23, 25, 27 do not appear in the Table of Contents is not due to a deliberate decision of the IEEE editor, but rather due to use of different paragraph format names in those chapters. I don't have a copy of the TOC with me, but I will guess that 26.6 also does not appear, although 26.1-26.5 do. Making all first-level subclauses use the same paragraph formats will automatically cause them to appear in the TOC as well. Shalom > Generate TOC with 2 levels of subclauses instead of just > one. Coordinate with IEEE editor. > > For discussion: > This includes Clauses 23, 25, and 27 > (PLI routine definitions). > The number of subclauses in these clauses is very large. > In current IEEE version, the TOC does not include any > subclauses of these clauses, although all the other > section TOCs includes one level of subclauses. > http://boydtechinc.com/cgi-bin/issueproposal.pl?cmd=view&pr=102 |
| Unformatted |
|
Hosted by Boyd Technology