| Number | 103
|
| Category | errata
|
| Synopsis | Index missing
|
| State | lrmdraft
|
| Class | errata-discuss
|
| Arrival-Date | Aug 22 2002
|
| Originator | Shalom.Bresticker@motorola.com
|
| Release | 2001b: Index
|
| Environment |
|
| Description |
In IEEE version of 1364-2001, there is no Index. That is usual IEEE policy. But IEEE Standards Style Manual says we can request an Index. Need to work together with IEEE Standards Project Editor. Index must refer to subclause number rather than page number. |
| Fix |
Return Index. Work together with IEEE Editor. Index must refer to Subclause #, not page #. Note: there may not be time to add index references to text added in 2001c. |
| Audit-Trail |
From: Shalom.Bresticker@motorola.com To: etf-bugs@boyd.com Cc: Subject: Re: errata/103: PROPOSAL - Index missing Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2003 11:13:53 +0200 (IST) So far, we have only done corrections and minor additions to the 1364-2001 text. But if we start adding more major changes, like SystemVerilog stuff, then it is a whole different ballgame, requiring a LOT more work. Shalom On Wed, 1 Jan 2003, Shalom Bresticker wrote: > Date: Wed, 1 Jan 2003 23:51:00 -0800 > From: Shalom Bresticker <Shalom.Bresticker@motorola.com> > To: etf-bugs@boyd.com > Subject: errata/103: PROPOSAL - Index missing > > > Return Index. > > Work together with IEEE Editor. > > Index must refer to Subclause #, not page #. > > Note: there may not be time to add index references to text > added in 2001c. > http://boydtechinc.com/cgi-bin/issueproposal.pl?cmd=view&pr=103 > |
| Unformatted |
|
Hosted by Boyd Technology