| Number | 132
|
| Category | errata
|
| Synopsis | Change Table and Figure numbering from consecutive to X-Y
|
| State | lrmdraft
|
| Class | errata-discuss
|
| Arrival-Date | Sep 26 2002
|
| Originator | Shalom.Bresticker@motorola.com
|
| Release | 2001b: passim
|
| Environment |
|
| Description |
In IEEE version of 1364-2001, they changed the table numbering from X-Y, where X is clause number and Y is table number within clause, to a consecutive numbering scheme through the entire document. This contrasts with the Syntax box numbering, which remained with the X-Y scheme, and with the Draft 6 numbering scheme. Personally, in such a big document, I feel the X-Y scheme is much more convenient. I checked the IEEE Standard Style Guide. It says that normally the consecutive numbering scheme is used, but if the document is very big, then the X-Y scheme should be used. So I propose that in the next revision, we go back to the X-Y scheme. Shalom |
| Fix |
Change Table and Figure numbering from consecutive throught the entire document to X-Y, where X is the Clause number and Y is the Table/Figure number within the Clause. So Table 12 becomes Table 4-4. That is how it was in Draft 6. The price is being different from the current document. |
| Audit-Trail |
From: Shalom Bresticker <Shalom.Bresticker@motorola.com> To: etf-bugs@boyd.com Cc: Subject: Re: errata/132: Table numbering Date: Thu, 03 Oct 2002 09:27:07 +0300 >Category: errata >Confidential: no >Originator: Shalom Bresticker <Shalom.Bresticker@motorola.com> >Class: TBD >Description: > So I propose that in the next revision, we go back to the X-Y scheme. Same for figures. |
| Unformatted |
|
Hosted by Boyd Technology