| Number | 196
|
| Category | errata
|
| Synopsis | 8.6 -- udp_instantiation BNF different in 8.6 than in Annex A
|
| State | lrmdraft
|
| Class | errata-simple
|
| Arrival-Date | Nov 18 2002
|
| Originator | "Brad Pierce" <Brad.Pierce@synopsys.com>
|
| Release | 2001b: 8.6 (Syntax 8-2)
|
| Environment |
|
| Description |
According to A.5.4, a udp_instantiation may optionally have an attribute_instance before the udp_instance. According to Syntax 8-2, it may not. -- Brad |
| Fix |
In Syntax 8-2, remove "[attribute_instance]" from udp_instantiation, making it the same as in Annex A.5.4. udp_instantiation ::= udp_identifier [ drive_strength ] [ delay2 ] udp_instance { , udp_instance } ';' |
| Audit-Trail |
From: Shalom Bresticker <Shalom.Bresticker@motorola.com> To: Brad Pierce <Brad.Pierce@synopsys.com> Cc: etf-bugs@boyd.com Subject: Re: errata/196: 8.6, A.5.4 -- udp_instantiation BNF different in 8.6 than in Annex A Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2002 16:07:27 +0200 >Category: errata >Confidential: no >Originator: Shalom Bresticker <Shalom.Bresticker@motorola.com> >Release: 2001b >Class: TBD >Description: > According to A.5.4, a udp_instantiation may optionally have > an attribute_instance before the udp_instance. According to > Syntax 8-2, it may not. Reversed. Anyway, it looks like the [ attribute_instance ] should NOT be there. If we compare the udp_instantiation to module_instantiation and gate_instantiation, as in Syntax 2-6, we see that the attribute_instance comes before the udp/module/gate_instantiation, not before the udp/module/gate_instance. So A.5.4, WITHOUT the attribute_instance, is correct, and it should be deleted from Syntax 8-2. |
| Unformatted |
|
Hosted by Boyd Technology