| Number | 368
|
| Category | errata
|
| Synopsis | 26.3.3 Should vpiLineNo and vpiFile apply to generate objs?
|
| State | ptfpassed
|
| Class | errata-ptf
|
| Arrival-Date | Jun 25 2003
|
| Originator | Charles Dawson
|
| Release | 2001b
|
| Environment |
|
| Description |
Because generated objects such as genvars (and the potentially new objects gen scopes and gen scope arrays) do not necessarily actually exist somewhere in the HDL, they should be considered for inclusion in section 26.3.3. |
| Fix |
This has been resolved via: http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=0000312 |
| Audit-Trail |
From: Shalom Bresticker <Shalom.Bresticker@motorola.com> To: chas@cadence.com Cc: ptf-bugs@boyd.com Subject: Re: errata/368: 26.3.3 Should vpiLineNo and vpiFile apply to generate objs? Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2003 18:47:48 +0300 This was sent to etf-bugs instead of ptf-bugs. Charles, I assume you meant "exclusion" instead of "inclusion". Shalom chas@cadence.com wrote: > Precedence: bulk > > >Number: 368 > >Category: errata > >Originator: Charles Dawson > >Environment: > > >Description: > > Because generated objects such as genvars (and the > potentially new objects gen scopes and gen scope arrays) > do not necessarily actually exist somewhere in the HDL, > they should be considered for inclusion in section 26.3.3. -- Shalom Bresticker Shalom.Bresticker@motorola.com Design & Reuse Methodology Tel: +972 9 9522268 Motorola Semiconductor Israel, Ltd. Fax: +972 9 9522890 POB 2208, Herzlia 46120, ISRAEL Cell: +972 50 441478 From: Charles Dawson <chas@cadence.com> To: Shalom Bresticker <Shalom.Bresticker@motorola.com> Cc: ptf-bugs@boyd.com Subject: Re: errata/368: 26.3.3 Should vpiLineNo and vpiFile apply to generate objs? Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2003 10:30:20 -0400 No, inclusion would be correct. The section describes object to which vpiLineNo and vpiFile do not apply. Therefore, we may want to include these objects. -Chas Shalom Bresticker wrote: > > Precedence: bulk > > The following reply was made to PR errata/368; it has been noted by GNATS. > > From: Shalom Bresticker <Shalom.Bresticker@motorola.com> > To: chas@cadence.com > Cc: ptf-bugs@boyd.com > Subject: Re: errata/368: 26.3.3 Should vpiLineNo and vpiFile apply to generate > objs? > Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2003 18:47:48 +0300 > > This was sent to etf-bugs instead of ptf-bugs. > > Charles, I assume you meant "exclusion" instead of "inclusion". > > Shalom > > > chas@cadence.com wrote: > > > Precedence: bulk > > > > >Number: 368 > > >Category: errata > > >Originator: Charles Dawson > > >Environment: > > > > >Description: > > > > Because generated objects such as genvars (and the > > potentially new objects gen scopes and gen scope arrays) > > do not necessarily actually exist somewhere in the HDL, > > they should be considered for inclusion in section 26.3.3. > > -- > Shalom Bresticker Shalom.Bresticker@motorola.com > Design & Reuse Methodology Tel: +972 9 9522268 > Motorola Semiconductor Israel, Ltd. Fax: +972 9 9522890 > POB 2208, Herzlia 46120, ISRAEL Cell: +972 50 441478 > > > -- Charles Dawson Senior Engineering Manager NC-Verilog Team Cadence Design Systems, Inc. 270 Billerica Road Chelmsford, MA 01824 (978) 262 - 6273 chas@cadence.com From: Shalom Bresticker <Shalom.Bresticker@motorola.com> To: ptf-bugs@boyd.com Cc: Subject: Re: errata/368: 26.3.3 Should vpiLineNo and vpiFile apply to generate objs? Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2003 17:35:18 +0300 Ah, now I understand. You meant inclusion in the list of exclusions. That is what confused me. > No, inclusion would be correct. The section describes object to which vpiLineNo > and vpiFile do not apply. Therefore, we may want to include these objects. -- Shalom Bresticker Shalom.Bresticker@motorola.com Design & Reuse Methodology Tel: +972 9 9522268 Motorola Semiconductor Israel, Ltd. Fax: +972 9 9522890 POB 2208, Herzlia 46120, ISRAEL Cell: +972 50 441478 Fix replaced by chas@cadence.com on Thu Mar 17 10:08:20 2005 This has been resolved via: http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=0000312 |
| Unformatted |
|
Hosted by Boyd Technology