| Number | 50
|
| Category | errata
|
| Synopsis | Section 19.5: descriptions of `include
|
| State | lrmdraft
|
| Class | errata-simple
|
| Arrival-Date | Oct 14 2001
|
| Originator | Shalom.Bresticker@motorola.com
|
| Release | 2001b, 19.5, 19.7
|
| Environment |
|
| Description |
- Examples: The text begins, "Examples of legal comments for ...". The word "comments" is wrong. How about simply "Examples of `include compiler directives are:" ? - The last line before the example refers to "included files". The NOTE after the example refers to "include files". The paragraph before 19.8 also refers to "include files". They should all be "include files" or "included files". |
| Fix |
Proposed: Section 19.5, last line before example: REPLACE: included files WITH: include files First sentence of the example of 19.5: REPLACE: "The examples of legal comments for the `include compiler directive are as follows:" WITH: "Examples of `include comiler directives are as follows:" |
| Audit-Trail |
From: Shalom Bresticker <Shalom.Bresticker@motorola.com> To: etf-bugs@boyd.com Cc: Subject: Re: errata/50: "include file" vs "included file" Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2002 14:06:08 +0200 >Category: errata >Confidential: no >Originator: Shalom Bresticker <Shalom.Bresticker@motorola.com> >Release: 2001b >Class: TBD >Description: The term "include file" appears 8 times, in the following places: 1 time in 19.5 (NOTE at end) 4 times in 19.7 (last 2 paragraphs) 2 times in 20.8 (title, 1st paragraph) 1 time in 21.3.2 (1st paragraph) The phrase "included file" appears only once, in 19.5, before the examples. Based on this, I prefer to change the single "included file" to "include file". |
| Unformatted |
|
Hosted by Boyd Technology