| Number | 78
|
| Category | errata
|
| Synopsis | passim: Inconsistent spelling of "bit-select" and "part-select"
|
| State | lrmdraft
|
| Class | errata-simple
|
| Arrival-Date | Jul 24 2002
|
| Originator | Shalom Bresticker <Shalom.Bresticker@motorola.com>
|
| Release | 2001b: passim
|
| Environment |
|
| Description |
Sometimes "bit-select" and "part-select" are written with hypens and sometimes with a space. I think it should always be a hyphen. Also, how should it be written when you want to refer to both bit-selects and part-selects? Sometimes, as in Table 30, it appears as "bit and part selects". Then, it is not always clear that "bit" refers to "selects". The clearest way to write would be "bit-selects and part-selects". Lacking that, you could write "bit- and part-selects". -- Shalom Bresticker Shalom.Bresticker@motorola.com Design & Reuse Methodology Tel: +972 9 9522268 Motorola Semiconductor Israel, Ltd. Fax: +972 9 9522890 POB 2208, Herzlia 46120, ISRAEL Cell: +972 50 441478 "The devil is in the details." |
| Fix |
Change all "bit select" to "bit-select". Change all "part select" to "part-select". Change all "bit and part selects" and "bit- and part-selects" to "bit-selects and part-selects". Change all "bit or part selects" and "bit- or part-selects" to "bit-selects or part-selects". Change all "bit or part select" and "bit- or part-select" to "bit-select or part-select". |
| Audit-Trail |
|
| Unformatted |
|
Hosted by Boyd Technology